Digitalization of Religious Courts and Transformation of Islamic Family Law in Indonesia: Analysis of Institutional Innovation and Implementation of e-Court

Authors

  • M. Saeful Amri Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al-Hikmah 2 Brebes
  • Tazkiyyatun Nafisah Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang
  • Agus Irfan Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang
  • Muhammad Azam Al-Iraqia University Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66277/kanuun.v1i1.9

Keywords:

e-Court, Islamic Family Law, Digital Religious Judiciary

Abstract

The digital transformation within Indonesia’s judicial system has brought significant changes to the governance of case resolution, including within the realm of Islamic family law. This study aims to analyse the implementation of the e-Court system within the religious court environment and its impact on procedural effectiveness, transparency, and justice in family law cases such as divorce, alimony, and child custody. The research employs a juridical-empirical approach, analysing Supreme Court regulations, particularly Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 3 of 2018 on Electronic Court Administration, along with case studies from several religious courts that have implemented digital services. The findings reveal that the adoption of e-Court accelerates administrative processes, reduces litigation costs, and enhances public access to justice, especially for parties residing far from the court. However, challenges remain, including limited digital literacy, uneven network infrastructure, and the need to adapt Islamic family law norms to online judicial practices. This study asserts that the digitalization of religious courts is not merely a technical innovation but a strategic reform aimed at aligning Islamic family law with modern social dynamics. The integration of technology and Sharia values is thus essential in realising a fair, efficient, and ethical family judiciary in the era of digital disruption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrahman, M. (2021). Mediasi dalam perspektif hukum Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Abou El Fadl, K. (2014). Reasoning with God: Reclaiming Shari‘ah in the modern age. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Ali, A. M. (2023). Reformasi birokrasi peradilan Islam di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Al-Ghazali, A. H. (2000). Ihya’ ‘Ulum al-Din. Kairo: Dar al-Ma‘arif.

Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1997). Fiqh al-Daulah fi al-Islam. Kairo: Dar al-Syuruq.

Al-Syatibi, A. I. (2003). Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Syari‘ah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Zuhayli, W. (2001). Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr.

Azizy, A. Q. (2002). Eklektisisme hukum nasional: Kompetisi antara hukum Islam dan hukum umum. Yogyakarta: Gama Media.

Badan Litbang Diklat Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI. (2023). Laporan evaluasi pelaksanaan e-Court di Pengadilan Agama. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI.

Badilag MA RI. (2023). Panduan implementasi e-Court di peradilan agama. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI.

BPS RI. (2024). Survei partisipasi digital Indonesia 2024. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Direktorat Jenderal Badilag. (2023). Laporan implementasi e-Court di Pengadilan Agama tahun 2023. Jakarta: Badilag MA RI.

Djamil, F. (1999). Filsafat hukum Islam. Jakarta: Logos.

Fathoni, A. (2020). Etika profesi hukum Islam dan peradilan agama. Semarang: Walisongo Press.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyyah. (2003). I‘lām al-Muwaqqi‘īn ‘an Rabb al-‘Ālamīn. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Ishaq. (2017). Metode penelitian hukum dan penulisan skripsi, tesis, serta disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Kamali, M. H. (2008). Shari‘ah law: An introduction. Oxford: Oneworld.

Komisi Yudisial. (2024). Laporan akuntabilitas peradilan 2024. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial RI.

Mahkamah Agung RI. (2018). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 tentang Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan secara Elektronik. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI.

Mahkamah Agung RI. (2024). Laporan transformasi digital peradilan agama 2024. Jakarta: Badilag MA RI.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasution, H. (1995). Islam rasional: Gagasan dan pemikiran. Jakarta: UI Press.

Nurdin, M. (2018). Keadilan sosial dalam perspektif maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

OECD. (2023). Judicial digital transformation and local readiness 2023. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Rahardjo, S. (2000). Hukum dan masyarakat. Bandung: Angkasa.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum progresif: Sebuah sintesa hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Setiawan, D. (2019). Modernisasi peradilan Islam di Indonesia. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Teubner, G. (1993). Law as an autopoietic system. Oxford: Blackwell.

Transparency International Indonesia. (2024). Peradilan dan digital governance 2024. Jakarta: Transparency International Indonesia.

UNDP Indonesia. (2023). Access to justice in Indonesia: Digital reform report 2023. Jakarta: UNDP.

Zahro, A. (2015). Fiqh kontekstual: Rekonstruksi pemikiran hukum Islam di era modern. Surabaya: IAIN Sunan Ampel Press.

Zubaedi. (2019). Isu-isu aktual pendidikan Islam dan etika sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.Zuhdi, N. (2022). Fikih kontemporer

Downloads

Published

2026-02-01

Issue

Section

Articles